THE SCIENCE OF DECODING OF ART AGENCY BETWEEN THE APORIAE OF AESTHETIC PARADIGMS AND THE STITCHES OF HERMENEUTIC PARABlES

Abstract

The main topic of this essay is the, seemingly superfluous, question of whose is the finger on the Sistine Ceiling? If the God is omnipresent, the man is simply sinful. Wanting it or not, the science is to be trusted, in the secular conformity, and art is to represent „the God’s hand“, and nothing else. In this state of common sense, the process of deciphering of authorship renders the superfluity questionable; in the first place, by the fact that this phenomenon has been current in the rational science for more than two centuries. In genesis of a scientific paradigm, an aporia is natural state. This is the strain of thought that occurs not only in following Karl Popper’s determinant of the questionability of objective knowledge. The main topic of this essay is how exactly the scientific foundation of truth should open to the question of veracity of authorship. This is an attempt to apply experiences of the phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty and the hermeneutic poststructuralist fruits in which the logic of the stitched on aporiae of aesthetic paradigms is more than self-sufficient objective description of symbiotic states of the phenomenon of authorship. Or, in our case, how valuable is the question: how much Raša Todosijević’s exclamation Gott liebt die Serben, is in fact „an outcry of a feeble“?